Hot Takes

An opinion piece in The Hill today tells the SEC to reject the listing of Bitcoin ETFs and it's very misguided.

Penned by Georgetown business professor Jim Angel, the article is almost as alarmist as it is pessimistic.

While he writes that “Informed investors should be allowed to make their own investment decisions without interference from a nanny-state government,” Angel nevertheless argues that investors should be denied the opportunity to decide to invest in Bitcoin ETFs. The reason, he says, is that Bitcoin ETF applications have not disclosed that “criminal activities are the primary use of Bitcoin.” Unfortunately, Angel doesn’t cite any evidence for this proposition, just some personal anecdotes.

No doubt there are illicit uses of Bitcoin, but as law enforcement officials have said time after time, it’s a challenge they are more than capable of meeting. While Angel says that “Bitcoin is a payment system ideally suited to the black market,” I think the dozens of criminals now behind bars because law enforcement used Bitcoin’s blockchain to track them would disagree. Bitcoin is not as anonymous as is often portrayed. And it certainly isn’t the cause of ransomware as Angel implies.

If every company whose products were used illicitly by criminals had to disclose as much in their securities filings, drug companies might have to state that a large proportion of pain killers end up on the black market, banks would have to disclose how their accounts are routinely used by criminals to launder billions of dollars, and maybe even car companies would have to say that their vehicles are used for getaways. It’s not clear retail investors would be any better denied the opportunity to invest in drug companies, banks, or auto firms because they don’t disclose this on SEC forms, but that’s what Angel suggests for Bitcoin ETFs.

The advent of the Internet led to rampant piracy, the proliferation of porn and illegal gambling, easier criminal communications, anonymous harassment, as well as new kinds of confidence scams. Could you imagine if the government in the early 1990s took advice like that of Mr. Angel? Advice that amounts to, “Please look only at the potential costs of this technology and ignore all the potential benefits because they’re too unproven and uncertain.” (That advice might have looked a little like this.) We would be much, much poorer today.

Luckily the government then dismissed techno-pessimists like Angel and, at the time, Newsweek columnist Clifford Stoll, who wrote this timeless piece in 1995. Instead the federal government adopted the optimistic view that we could embrace the promise of technology while mitigating its risks where needed. This was the basis for the Clinton Administration’s policy toward the Internet, and it should be what guides the SEC as it makes its decisions on Bitcoin ETFs.

Link/Tweet

Keeping track of the cryptocurrency bills in Congress.

As part of our work to keep cryptocurrency networks open, decentralized, and permissionless, Coin Center tracks the introduction and current status of federal legislation that mentions, or relates to, cryptocurrencies. During the first months of the 116th Congress, we have identified 11 such bills as having been introduced in either the House of Representatives or the Senate.

As a resource to those interested in public policy and the regulation of cryptocurrencies, we have decided to make our “Crypto Bills Tracker” publicly available. We will be periodically updating it as bills are introduced and move through the legislative process, and hope it will serve as a useful resource for the cryptocurrency community.

Link/Tweet

Coin Center files comment in CFTC proceeding on Ethereum

A few months ago LabCFTC, the division of the agency dealing with innovative financial products, put out a request for information to better understand the Ethereum network and ecosystem that has developed around it. We have submitted a formal comment explaining what Ethereum is and how it works relative to other public blockchain networks like Bitcoin. Issues covered include smart contracts, consensus mechanisms (current and planned), governance, etc.

You can read the full comment here.

Link/Tweet

We demonstrated the Bitcoin Lightning Network in Congress.

Earlier today, Coin Center hosted a briefing in Congress in conjunction with the Congressional Blockchain Caucus. We covered the basics of cryptocurrency, why it’s exciting, and went through some the policy issues the technology raises, including questions of scaling, privacy, consumer protection, and tax.

One of the things made uniquely possible by cryptocurrency is microtransactions--tiny transactions without a middleman. To visualize this concept, we used a lightning enabled candy dispenser. We were able to show the process of sending tiny amounts of bitcoin from our phones to the vending machine and watch it dispense candy in real time. The network fees were 1 satoshi per transaction.

Real time demonstrations like these are always better than simply describing a process. We are grateful to Swiss developer David Knezić for generously donating the dispenser to Coin Center.

The well-attended briefing was the first of many that the Congressional Blockchain Caucus plans to hold in 2019. We are excited to continue helping them and their colleagues better understand and appreciate this technology.

Here are the slides from our presentation:

Link/Tweet

New York is creating a cryptocurrency task force. We encourage them to reevaluate the BitLicense as part of their work.

As any cryptocurrency entrepreneur will tell you, getting a BitLicense is difficult and costly. Not only that, but as written the regulation has grey areas relating to custody, requires state approval before a company can add new products or services, and very few licenses have been issued.

The result of this is that many cryptocurrency businesses are choosing to simply forgo doing business with customers in New York.

We are glad to see the New York legislature taking the step of creating a task force to better evaluate the cryptocurrency landscape and its own regulatory stance toward the technology, which is well overdue. As Assemblyman Clyde Vanel noted, “It has been nearly four years since the implementation of the BitLicense. In the cryptocurrency space and technology in general, a few months is equivalent to years.”

We look forward engaging with the task force on this important mission.

Link/Tweet

A bill that would clarify securities law for tokens and improve the tax treatment of cryptocurrencies was just introduced in Congress.

Today, Reps. Warren Davidson and Darren Soto introduced the Token Taxonomy Act, which includes several common-sense changes to federal law.

First, the bill would amend the definition of “security” in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to exclude decentralized cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, thereby making clear that such cryptocurrencies are not subject to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We have longargued that classifying decentralized cryptocurrencies as securities would be both impractical and harmful to innovation, a view that the SEC has, to its great credit, also recently taken. Although the SEC has put forth sensible guidance on this question, codifying that decentralized cryptocurrencies are not securities would mitigate any lingering uncertainty.

The bill would also make several changes to the tax treatment of cryptocurrencies. One such change that we have long argued for is a de minimis exemption for cryptocurrency transactions for goods and services. Today, if you buy a cup of coffee with bitcoins and the price of bitcoin has increased since you acquired it, you would have to calculate, report, and pay taxes on any capital gains that you realized as a result of the transaction, no matter how small they might be. The Token Taxonomy Act would create an exemption from this requirement for any gains under $600, similar to the de minimis exemption that foreign currency transactions enjoy today, which we think is a simple and fair way to avoid unfairly discouraging the use of cryptocurrency as a means of payment.

We are happy to see continued action from Congress to implement common-sense clarifications and adjustments to the regulatory treatment of cryptocurrencies. We are looking forward to continued engagement with policymakers on these issues to ensure that the fruits of cryptocurrency innovation are not lost to ill-considered policy.

Link/Tweet

The next Coin Center Annual Dinner will be on May 13, 2019

Save the date! Blockchain’s night out is back. We will be returning the the magnificent ballroom of the Plaza Hotel in New York City after the first night of Consensus 2019.

Join us for a evening of food and drink with the best of the cryptocurrency industry, all while supporting Coin Center’s critical policy advocacy mission.

Monday, May 13, 2018 - 7:00 PM

The Plaza Hotel

768 5th Avenue, New York, NY 10019

Individual tickets will be available in early 2019.

You can see pictures from past dinners here.

For table sponsorship opportunities contact antonie@coincenter.org.

Link/Tweet

Two new digital asset associations launch to advance cryptocurrency professionalization.

Over the last week, The Association for Digital Asset Markets and Mexican Blockchain Association both launched. Their goals are to develop industry standards, codes of conduct, and best practices among companies working with public blockchain networks.

You can read ADAM’s founding principles here and about the Mexican Blockchain Association (in Spanish) here.

It is great to see cryptocurrency industry participants increasingly work together to improve their standards and build an orderly cryptocurrency ecosystem. We are looking forward to working with both organizations.

Link/Tweet

Based in Washington, D.C., Coin Center is the leading non-profit research and advocacy center focused on the public policy issues facing cryptocurrency and decentralized computing technologies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Our mission is to build a better understanding of these technologies and to promote a regulatory climate that preserves the freedom to innovate using permissionless blockchain technologies.