Hot Takes

European regulators are under the impression that “open” blockchains may be inappropriate for financial services.

That was one of the conclusions of the European Securities and Markets Authority in a discussion paper on its Consultation on the Distributed Ledger Technology Applied to Securities Markets on which it sought comment. We filed a detailed comment letter with ESMA explaining that “the presumption that only permissioned-based systems are ‘likely’ to be used in financial markets is premature.” We explain that there is nothing inherent in open blockchain networks that makes them inappropriate for use in financial markets or inferior to permissioned systems on the margins of efficiency, security, or privacy. The whole thing is worth reading.

Link / Tweet

The price of bitcoin still doesn’t matter right now.

The new year began with a bang as the price of a single bitcoin rocketed up past $1,100 and quickly fell back to around $900, where it seems to be holding steady for now. With such dramatic price movement comes attention, especially from those who are excited about the investment possibilities for Bitcoin and similar decentralized blockchain-based assets.

The last time there was so much attention on the price, Coin Center executive director Jerry Brito made the case in Wired that focusing so much on this one fluctuating metric is a distraction:

Unlike the early Web, though, Bitcoin has a price ticker people look at daily, and so they wring their hands. Every dip and spike in the price gets a lot of attention and spells either doom or “irrational exuberance.” But as Marc Andreessen has pointed out, “the price of domain names didn’t determine the usefulness of the Internet.”

With a longer time horizon in mind, you can put the short-term drops and rallies in price of Bitcoin in perspective. So don’t worry so much.

The case holds true even today and should be referred to for perspective every time there is a sudden burst in bitcoin price news.  

Link / Tweet

"Dear Mr. Trump: To ‘Cyber’ Better, Try the Blockchain."

As president-elect Trump prepares to take office he must develop comprehensive plans to address growing cybesecurity concerns. In a recent op-ed for WIRED, Coin Center director of research Peter Van Valkenburgh suggests a novel approach: embracing new internet infrastructure built on open, permissionless, blockchain networks that would be far more resilient than the vulnerable system in place today.

Trump’s team should know that open networks like bitcoin are a promising development in the otherwise bleak story of cybersecurity, even if while they sometimes present challenges to law enforcement and financial regulators. Just like the early internet, these tools may cause a policy headache or two, but they are well worth protecting.

Read the full op-ed on wired.com.

Link / Tweet

This academic study of digital currency businesses needs your help.

The University of Cambridge Judge Business School’s Centre for Alternative Finance is launching the first Global Blockchain Benchmarking Study. We’ve partnered with the centre to help create what will be a global empirical understanding of how cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology are being used today. 

But of course a study needs data! And that’s where you come in. If your company is building products in the areas of token exchange, wallet security, mining, wallets, and payments/money transfer then we would appreciate it if you took the time to fill out a brief survey

The results of this study will be published by the CCAF in early 2017. All survey participants have the option to be prominently acknowledged in the benchmarking report with their logo displayed. Please note that all identifying information from organizations that complete the benchmarking surveys will be removed from the research team's analysis, and findings will only be presented in an aggregated form (e.g., by country).

Link / Tweet

Coin Center filed comments with the Federal Elections Commission on bitcoin political contributions.

We did so on Friday in response to a proposed rulemaking considering how to classify bitcoin and similar cryptocurrency contributions, and whether they should be subject to the same $100 cap as cash.

Citing Bitcoin’s scarcity and its classification as a commodity by the CFTC and property by the IRS, we recommend that the IRS treat bitcoin donations as “in-kind contributions” under the Commission’s regulations, which would require no amendment to the rules and have no lower contribution limits like cash. On that question of a low cash-like limit, we clarify some common misconsceptions present in the Commission’s notice. Namely that bitcoin transactions as untraceable and that bitcoin intermediaries are not BSA-regulated.

We hope the FEC will find these comments useful and let Bitcoin into the campaign trail.

Link / Tweet

The OCC has decided to pursue the federal fintech charter for which we have been advocating.

We've been calling for a federal alternative to state money transmission licensing for digital currency companies since our inception, and today we are thrilled by Comptroller Curry's remarks: that the OCC will be providing that path in the form of a national fintech charter.

We've repeatedly argued in regulatory comments, letters, testimony, and breifings that the complexities and uncertainties of the state licensing system is one of the key impediments to digital currency innovation here in the U.S. As we wrote in our most recent comment to the OCC:

The U.S. does not currently offer a particularly welcoming home for digital currency exchanges because of two troublesome structural features of U.S. financial regulation that are not present in many foreign jurisdictions: federalism, and a rules-based rather than principles-based approach.

Today's announcement is great news for the federalism half of that problematic equation, because it opens up the possibility for preemption of state by state licensing laws for those companies that obtain a federal charter. Best of all, this approach doesn't necessarily create new obligations for companies. Firms can still seek licenses or charters at the state level, but now a unified federal approach will also be an option. As the Comptroller remarked:

Merely making a charter available, does not create a requirement to seek one. Nor does it displace the other choices a fintech company may have—for example, seeking a state bank charter in a state that makes one available or to continue operating outside the banking system. A company’s choice to pursue a national charter should be driven by the company’s business model and strategy on how best to serve their intended customers.

And a federal charter would be a very sensisble option for companies in the digital currency space who, because of the nature and of the Internet and digital currency networks, operate globally from day one. We've yet to review any specifics of the proposed chartering process but hopefully it will be in line with our other big ask from the OCC: that consumer protection regulation of these innovative firms follow a principles-based rather than rules-based approach, mirroring the FCA's flexibile approach to regulating these firms in the UK.

We'll keep working toward that goal, but today we're happy just to celebrate this excellent step in the right direction. 

Link / Tweet

The IRS’s indiscriminate request for Coinbase data sets a dangerous precedent.

In a recent editorial for American Banker, Coin Center executive Jerry Brito lays out why this apparent fishing expedition by the agency is based on flimsy evidence and a simplistic assumption that all Bitcoin users are tax cheats:

In this case, the specific criteria are not very specific at all. The government is seeking the information on every U.S. customer who used the exchange between 2013 and 2015 – a class so broad that it encompasses millions. And what is the "reasonable" basis? In its filing, the IRS notes the fact that some people have indeed used bitcoin to evade taxes, as well as "a public perception that tax evasion is possible with virtual currency." But all the IRS cites to back up that point is a Huffington Post article. This is an incredibly weak foundation to support breaching the privacy of millions of Americans. It's possible to use cash to evade taxes, so by this standard the IRS should be able to access the private records of everyone who uses cash with a single court order.

You can read the full editorial here. We will continue to voice our opposition to this request, watch this space for updates.

Link / Tweet

The IRS is seeking the identities and transaction histories of all Coinbase customers in the U.S.

It has petitioned a court to let it serve what is known as a “John Doe Summons,” which requires a business to turn over information about any of its customers that match a specific criteria. In this case it is “United States persons who, at any time during the period January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015, conducted transactions in a convertible virtual currency[.]” That is such a broad class that it could encompass millions of accountholders.

Often used on off-shore banks, a John Doe summons is a powerful tool that the IRS uses to identify tax evaders when there is “a reasonable basis for believing that such person or group or class of persons may fail or may have failed to comply with any provision of the tax laws.” In its filing, the IRS cites a couple of instances in which virtual currency was used to evade taxes, as well as public perceptions about it, among other things, as its reasonable basis.

That the IRS is investigating possible tax evasion using cryptocurrency is not surprising. What is surprising is how low the burden is that the IRS must meet to acquire the identities and transaction histories of millions of Americans–identities and histories that Coinbase is obligated to record by the Bank Secrecy Act. Coinbase has responded:

We take user privacy very seriously and will work to protect the privacy of our users in broad information requests. We are taking a very careful look at this petition and the scope of the government’s authority as it relates to this request.

I’m not a tax lawyer, nor an expert on these types of petitions, but I can’t imagine that such a request affecting so many people can have many precedents, and I would hope that a court would want to see much more before it allowed the privacy of so many people to be affected. Stay tuned.

Link / Tweet

Based in Washington, D.C., Coin Center is the leading non-profit research and advocacy center focused on the public policy issues facing cryptocurrency and decentralized computing technologies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Our mission is to build a better understanding of these technologies and to promote a regulatory climate that preserves the freedom to innovate using permisionless blockchain technologies.